Ubisoft/Microsoft reps and other users who are intentionally censoring this article by removing any mention of the widespread compatibility issues need to be banned. I've have already re-submitted this page to 'Requests for Protection' in the hopes this will stop you anonymously and without discussion re-adding that section in. Please realize that the forum threads themselves are not valid sources, and any document that solely mentions that such threads exist does not in and of itself validate the argument. Please refrain from re-adding this information CobaltBlue612 08:10, 19 March 2007 (UTC) Until notable first/second party sources such as reputable websites come forward with definitive information (Read: Not simply a 'Wow some people are angry on thos forums') then established Wikipedia policy clearly states that such unsubstantiated information is unsuitable for inclusion in the articles. I'm going to put this forward again for protection since people keep anonymously putting forward this nonsense when it seems like nothing but a minority of people flaming mixed with a bit of the usual anti-360 virtrol that comes with games for this platform. I've yet again removed the relevant section from the article. 元m0n Juic3 ( talk) 01:32, 8 January 2008 (UTC) The 'Xbox 360 Issues' Debate Removed Again One random question aren't there more than four installments? I may be wrong, but aren't there around eight? By the way, your proposed structure looks good. Maybe it would be useful to start making a list? Some of the info is available out there now, but it may be necessary to wait until the official PC release to clear up all the differences. Many of the things listed in this article are console-only items, or things that are very different in the PC version. I think that a rework is definitely in order, although I don't think the problem is the structure so much as the fact that the current article doesn't differentiate between the console versions and the PC version. I guess it's all up to your opinion, It may eventually get edited anyway. Sounds like a great idea, but I don't think you need to add a list of weapons and support vehicles since a weapons list isn't recommended.
Some idiot keeps changing the dates Īdvanced Warfighter specifically states that the game took place in 2013 yet some idiot keeps changing it to 2014. 32 Xbox version the subject of the article?.23 Fair use rationale for Image:Supportelements.jpg.3.3 Why I've removed the 'Issues' section.